There's an ethical part about it, I guess, between being a doctor and everything else, and trying to play God. At the same time, there must be quite a sound case financially to perform some of these tests proactively, whether they're on identified at-risk children, to try to get them the help they need, or at least monitor them before their condition flares up or shows itself. Is that the discussion they're talking about at SickKids?
On May 7th, 2013. See this statement in context.