To follow up on that, one of the issues that Mr. Sabet puts forward as the reason we need to continue with a prohibition model is the higher potency of THC content over the years. It just strikes me that if we did have regulation just as we do for smoking or alcohol, that's something we could actually regulate. It would then produce a less harmful health risk. We could regulate in terms of adult use, as opposed to youth using.
In terms of regulation, I know the medical officers did a lot of work on this, but how do you actually see a regulatory regime in terms of managing the risks and harms?