If that's the case, why is the minister considering that she might actually do what she was asked to do by all of the provinces? I think risk is a factor, you said, in allowing for a drug to be produced, and the risks were clear. All of the public health officers, all of the provinces, showed the risk of OxyContin, a generic drug, being given as a prescription but hitting the street. I happen to know. I was part of the SNUD committee that looked at this issue. People would get a package from their doctor and they would go out and sell it on the street.
We know the risks. I'm saying if you wanted to have risk as one of your criteria, the risks were clear. You were asked by provinces, and you say you want to work with the provinces and territories, and you were asked by public health officers. We have an evidence base as to why one should get rid of OxyContin and not allow it to continue, remove the DIN, replace the DIN, based on risk of addiction and risk of street use.
I don't understand why this wasn't done then and why the minister is musing that she just might do it now. You haven't changed your regulations.