Very good.
I have one last question for you, Mr. Ouellette.
I'm not sure whether you had a look at the preamble to the bill, but one of the paragraphs reads as follows:
. . . whereas the current guidelines in Canada are based on those in the United States and are so restrictive as to severely limit the diagnosis of acute Lyme disease and deny the existence of continuing infection, thus abandoning sick people with a treatable illness;
Normally, the two countries have guidelines that are in sync with one another.
Do you have a theory as to why Canada adopted guidelines that were so different from the U.S.'s in this case?