I'm sorry that I was out for a moment. I was conferring about some of the amendments.
The issue, of course, between guidelines, national standard of care, and best practices is that all of these terms have significant linkage around jurisdictional questions. For patients in the Lyme disease community, the term best practices has been used in ways that have made them feel they've been denied treatment. National standard of care is a term that a lot of the Lyme disease community prefers.
In terms of guidelines from the federal agency versus national standard of care versus best practices, what's the best way forward, in your view, to make sure that we actually advance the diagnosis and treatment of patients without being hung up on the jurisdictional semantics?
I mean, it's important to respect the jurisdictions. It's also important to make sure that the patients receive the best possible care and the best diagnosis.