Okay.
I'm very encouraged by your conclusion that doctors should use a clinical approach for diagnosis. We've certainly heard this from a lot of people in the Lyme disease community and from other doctors that I've spoken with. They really believe that the lab tests are so problematic, and because it's so essential that if it is Lyme disease, it get treated early; hence, the clinical approach is the best.
How are you communicating this at the moment to the medical community, that they should approach this from a clinical diagnosis as opposed to waiting for lab tests?