Thank you for the question.
I think the standards of care are set by professional associations in the country, which very much are creatures of provincial jurisdictions. We recognize that this is just the way in which the system currently functions. However, on many diseases, on many health issues, the federal government has weighed in on the available evidence to support practice and has encouraged the adoption and sharing of practices across the country as they've been developed locally in the country. They are based on the latest scientific evidence as well, through CIHR and other research funding agencies.
From our perspective, the work that we would do—I appreciate that the label is really important and carries meaning—would really be to look at the evidence and to provide advice to clinicians with the best information and tools that could help them. We often use the terminology of guidance, guidelines, and best practices to get across essentially the evidence information base that we'd like clinicians to have at the tips of their fingers and their tongues to be able to use as part of their work.