I am very happy about that.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak my native language.
My first question is for Mr. Lexchin and Mr. Herder. Other witnesses may also make comments on this.
Earlier, we spoke about a contraceptive pill which, according to the old definition which is not included in Bill C-17, meant that a pregnancy was considered to be the consequence of a life choice. So, according to the new definition we find in the bill before us, are there other concrete examples of medications which were mistakenly classified?
In other words, will the new definition solve other situations we may have seen in Canada, aside from the contraceptive pill which was used as an example previously?