I have a very brief response.
I do understand the argument that Mr. Young is making about this being disputed in court and that if you added something to the list, it could possibly narrow it. But actually the reverse is true here, because with this subamendment we're just specifying that confidential business information does not include.... So it's actually not what's on the list; it's just making it clear that this would not be covered.
I do understand the argument he's making, but I don't think it would be a problem with this particular subamendment.