Well, it does seem that we're leaving an awful lot to regulation. I know there are things that are appropriate to regulation, but I do think that where we can give clarity in this bill, because it is such an important bill in terms of what the minister can do, it should be in the legislation.
Again, this amendment I think offers a sense of clarity and a better definition from which regulations can then flow, particularly in regard to new subparagraph 6(1.2)(d.1)(ii), which Mr. Young has just spoken about, those being the “results of clinic trials and investigational tests”, which aren't mentioned in the earlier government amendments. It's better to go for clarity in definition than not to.