I think it's in part based on the population, but you're right there is a significant amount of border movement of products and commodities through those three provinces. That's part of it. What it also says in a way is that we have obviously a huge geography in the middle there, in terms of the prairie provinces in terms of agriculture. We have a lot of very intense agriculture of certain types in provinces like Ontario and British Columbia, horticultural crops for example. There's that, whereas in the Prairies, we have a relatively smaller number of larger major crops. That might explain a little bit of the difference there. I think most importantly with this is that we actually have a very high level of success in bringing back to compliance those situations where we find non-compliance. We find educational letters and outreach campaigns are hugely successful in bringing folks back to compliance.
On the agriculture side, for example, there's a real understanding there that pest control products need to be used in a very specific way, and there's not any tolerance there for anything different. We know we can bring people back to compliance because of the way we set up our compliance and enforcement programs in the country. It's a big country; there are a lot of different sectors. There are a lot of commodity groups and organizations that we need to look at compliance with, but we will go sector by sector and if we find some non-compliance in a sector we'll take action as needed. We'll cycle back to those areas of higher risk, or those areas of non-compliance, and make sure that they are coming back to compliance.