Well, I'm told that the PMRA itself has referred to the lack of chronic toxicity study in bees as a critical data gap, yet they've given continual conditional registrations for neonics year after year. It seems to me that if you have a chronic toxicity study of neonics effects on bees that's been outstanding since the first registration in 2003—that's over a decade ago—there seems to be a real problem in the legislation. That's my assertion. It's not me saying this. It's the PMRA that says there's a critical data gap. That's problematic.
