Thank you. I'll be brief, as per the chair's request.
Of course, we do keep up with this discussion as it evolves. We just had a discussion very recently with another member of Parliament, and I guess the question is what harm are we trying to resolve? What are we trying to fix by regulating something? Some would argue that we already have a regulatory process for these substances and that it hasn't necessarily served us that well, if you look at some of the impacts. So I don't mean to throw it back with a question, but certainly we need to look at what we are trying to fix. What is the problem? What is the evidence pointing us to as the best means by which to do that? We've seen the tremendous damage from legal substances, controlled substances, and in fact illegal substances. So sometimes a regime in and of itself is perhaps not the panacea that some might make it out to be.