Thank you.
When you look at information in the main estimates, the information from year to year is inherently different, so it does make this analysis a little more difficult.
When we look at 2013-14, it truly reflects our actual expenditures and some of the incremental expenditures that were approved during some of the supplementary estimates. One big difference in our case here is also the statutory compensation payments.
If I look at the key difference here between $805 million and $698 million, in 2013-14 we had over 58 million dollars' worth of extra compensation payments, mostly related to infectious salmon anemia. Also, the difference between those two years is that this was the year we had, in budget 2012, the last savings reduction in our appropriations, and that was $45 million.
When you look sometimes a bit more in the future outlaying years, there are a few other reductions that are mainly sunsetters, for which we do expect to go forward and ask for renewal.