Thank you, to the member, for this question.
If we're only looking at the main estimates in this case, you're quite right in pointing out that there is a reduction in the funding coming to the Public Health Agency. The reduction is a net reduction. Some increases are coming for things like the Ebola virus preparedness—this was mentioned earlier—a bit of money for the Pan American Games, and some genomics research.
On the other hand we are seeing some decreases and the majority, if not most, of the decreases are due to a sunsetting initiative for the hepatitis C health care services program. You may recall that this relates to the earlier restitution that was provided to hep C individuals in Canada by way of compensation programs, a rather substantive program; and a complementary program of funding went to provinces and territories starting in 2001, I think it was, with payments provided to provinces and territories with the specific purpose of ensuring that hepatitis C sufferers would be able to access health care services correctly across the country in all aspects.
We're seeing a bit of a reduction, again, in the sunsetting initiative for a federal aboriginal health program. That is also part of the initiative that's going forward for renewal on the advice of the public service to the government, as was mentioned by my colleague.
Two other declines relate to completed projects. You may recall that we gave some money to the GSK facility in Sainte-Foy, Quebec, to build a new fill line for pandemic vaccine production capacity; that is done. We've also completed a project for automated external defibrillators with Heart and Stroke.