That's a great question. One of the most important things we're learning as we do our surveillance and we bring the results of our analysis to those who are developing programs and making a difference in communities is that we need to be better integrated. We need to join up the efforts that we're making in surveillance with the efforts that communities are putting forward to address their own unique needs, because there is no one size fits all as you well know. That's where our focus is right now.
I talked to you about our investments in innovation in mental health promotion. We've decided to put a focus on school-based interventions. There are a lot of areas, as you can imagine, that you could focus on in terms of positive mental health, but we've decided that with our innovation money, we're going to focus on the school setting. Why? Because that's where many factors get integrated. That's where kids come into the school and they're either bullied by their classmates, or they may come from home environments that are not conducive to their positive mental well-being and it can be the school system that becomes the most supportive environment for them.
I think we've turned a page on the way we work together in mental health and the prevention of mental illness. We've turned that page because in Canada we have the Mental Health Commission which is really leading the way in helping us understand what needs to be integrated and why. As you know, data can be used in a variety of different ways. I am trained as an epidemiologist. When I look at comparisons among countries, I always say to myself, the context within which these data are collected and the way they are reported are essential to us having an accurate interpretation of what they mean. While we get good signals—