It's early to say that this is a possibility. We haven't framed the regulations. We haven't even done a preliminary proposal yet. It's a legitimate discussion that will be raised in that context.
We want to have the science behind it. We are a science department. We want to make sure that when we attribute a harm that it's really there.
Again, this list that's here is the one we are starting with: sugar, salt, saturated fat. There may be other nutrients of concern or other aspects of food that we will build science around. Those are the ones that we have a lot of information and expertise on. Then it's articulating the regulations so it picks out those foods that really are governed by those considerations, because they do produce the harms.