Perhaps I can start and then turn to Alfred.
On the first question about performance measures, we have strengthened our approach to performance measures. We look across our programming from an integrated perspective. A performance measurement framework is in place. It looks at behavioural changes for project participants. It also looks at social and physical environments to support those behavioural changes. We have moved away from awareness only to looking for concrete and measurable health outcomes, and are now starting to look at physiological measures for some of our project programming.
That's the approach. I'm happy to share with you the performance measurement framework that we use for our integrated chronic disease program.
On the second question around inequalities, I spoke earlier about our role in understanding the portrait of health inequalities in Canada, as well as the narrative and the contextual considerations related to that. We've done a lot of work over the last five years related to that. The data tool is one part of that initiative.
The narrative report is a much richer part of the storytelling, in terms of the interaction between broader contextual factors—culture, tradition, interaction—and a lot of other considerations, such as income and education, to name a few, that look at the determinants of health and interaction with actual health behaviours, health status, and health outcomes. That's another role that we play.
As far as the broader work on acting on those determinants is concerned, we are taking steps with our programs to move further upstream. We know that Peel is a leader in this area in terms of looking at builds in social environments, to have the spaces and places where folks make the healthy choice and easier choice, whether that means access to walkability or to affordable food choices within their community.