Thank you, Chair, and thank you all for coming.
I have the disadvantage of being further down the list, so much of what I was going to ask has already been asked.
I particularly appreciated the comments about the incidents that occur when people get sick go to emergency departments. I'm a recovering ER doctor with about 20 years' experience. Much of my career was in a hospital in one of the poorest area codes in Canada, so we saw a lot of non-compliance with all sorts of diseases but particularly in problems with insulin.
In regard to the costs of diabetes, particularly to the cost of non-compliance, I have lost count of the number of times I treated DKA. We could actually write out the initial orders before seeing the patient because we saw it so often. We knew that if they ended up in the intensive care unit, it would cost tens of thousands of dollars. If they ended up needing coronary bypass surgery, for example, it would be about $60,000. One shocking number that came up is that when someone ends up on dialysis, it costs $70,000 a year per patient.
We've been trying to look for these numbers, which I've been using to defend whether we can afford pharmacare. I've always been of the mind that we can't afford not to.
In respect of cost-related non-compliance for all diseases, there are various estimates. It might be about $5 billion a year nationally. Do we have any estimates of cost-related non-compliance for diabetes alone? Are there any numbers out there to show what we might save the health care system in costs due to cost-related non-compliance if we supplied only the costs for diabetes?