Yes. I mean, that's up for debate, but I think the reason it will be very difficult to get buy-in is the fact that the majority of people out there.... I hate to stereotype individuals, but my background not just on Bay Street, but even in Brampton East, which I represent, tells me that people are out there to make money. That's their number one goal.
At the same time, obviously, we want to live in a healthy and vibrant society. That's where I believe government's role is; from a public policy perspective, it's to come up with that balance. That balance is really difficult to achieve when it's a for-profit company. Are we now looking at not-for-profit corporations that are going to be able to do public good? What's the cost-benefit analysis of investing in them?
At the same time, what are your views on tax policy reform? Are there certain jurisdictions that get this right when it comes to giving tax incentives to large companies or pharmaceuticals or not-for-profit research organizations to benefit the public good when it comes to open science?