Yes, for the catastrophic. We decided to move this in a very tiny step. We'd do catastrophic care and then we would have a bit of a deductible: the first $1,400 or $1,500 for that would be your responsibility, and then over that, if it were really catastrophic care required, you'd be covered. It wasn't a pure pharmacare plan as I always envisioned it, but I thought that if we could get the foot in the door through the catastrophic coverage.... But more importantly, at the time 14 years ago, that was basically how we were evolving and made sense.
I think we're at the stage today where we can, through science, determine what the drug formulary should be, pay for it through the contributions of all of society based on our ability to pay, as taxes are, and determined by the doctors, the professionals in concert with their patients.
I mean, how many different kinds of Lipitors do we need? There may be some differences, and I refer to the doctors who are here, but I think the stats are quite clear. Maybe it's true that Johnny out of step with the army is the correct person this time around, but I don't think so when it comes to the army dealing with the pharmacare plan.