I could briefly start off. My colleagues may disagree, but I'm sometimes accused of being sort of paralyzed by the need for evidence. There are some fantastic hypotheses brought forward, and we've answered them anecdotally. We need to stop doing that. We need actual research on what does actually.... Where's the prevalence? What are the right mitigating strategies? Who are the different target groups? Who's more susceptible? We need a little more evidence around that.
I don't think we should be stopping our interventions, just like we aren't in mental health. We need to move forward with some of those programs that we do understand around recognition of violence, de-escalation, tactical disengagement where appropriate, things like protecting both the patient and the workers through some form of support, as we discussed earlier—chemical restraints and things like that. We need to put some of that in place now, but we can't do that without proper evidence going forward. We need to do more research, and I think that's the role that this group could support.