You're entirely correct that other countries do have them. We've seen success in some, but some of them reduce their costs by just eliminating some of those therapies. They just say they're not going to pay for those therapies and take them right off, and the patients never get access to them. That's when I raise the issue that, however you define it or design it, the important part is how we design something that makes sure the patients are getting the treatments they need, but they're not limited to access.
You can limit access and save yourself a lot of money, just like I could say to you that I could save you a lot of money by telling you not to have any food in your fridge for a year. You'll save a lot of money, but there'll be consequences of not being able to eat for a year. It's the same thing when it comes to health care. If you are not getting access to certain therapies, there will be consequences to that, but you will save money though.