I do.
Mr. Chairman, I want to speak briefly to this, because from a matter of structure, I think Mr. Poilievre is correct that on this committee, we can study whatever we want. I think health care in Canada is a very complex issue, because, of course, it is split between the federal and provincial jurisdictions. I wouldn't want to support a ruling that would suggest this committee couldn't study something that may tie our hands in the future because it was within a local or provincial area.
I'm not going to be able to support your ruling. I'm not going to support his motion. As important as that issue may be to this local area, we have in front of us a study on pharmacare. We have passed motions on studying antimicrobial resistance, aboriginal health, community and home care, and now an opioid crisis, which we've just passed.
As important as Mr. Poilievre's issue may be about the location of a hospital in his area, those other issues have, in my respectful opinion, a far greater impact on Canadians. I just wanted to explain my reasoning. With great respect, I will be voting against the motion that we can't study it, but against the motion on the merits.