It would be big enough. Okay, you'd suggest we stick with one.
Mr. Askari, I just want to correct one or two things.
You said savings are the objective. That's not necessarily the case, sir. One of the objectives might be universal coverage for all Canadians, and we may recognize that it might cost us more money.
Second, Dr. Carrie was talking about a $17-billion deficit, but once again, not necessarily. Universal pharmacare might cost more money, but it could be funded by any number of increased revenue sources if we wanted to, so it doesn't necessarily add to a deficit. Is that not correct?