I just want to follow up on Mr. Davies' suggestion. I think it's worthwhile for us to take a look.
I think we did pass the motion preliminarily but agreed that we would look at it again at the end of this session, following this discussion. Maybe we could go back, address some of the questions and concerns that have been raised here, be a bit more specific in certain areas, and pass it over, but I still think we should have an iterative process with the PBO. We'll pass a motion to give them a more concrete direction of where we as a committee would like to see the study go, but then be receptive to a report back in two weeks from the PBO on what works, what doesn't work, and what advice they would give us to fine-tune it. I think that would be a bit more of an iterative process than to simply punt and wait for that to come back.