I know that we're in that landscape now, but it seems that—and it would make sense to me, and be the proof of the pudding—once OxyContin was made tamper resistant, people couldn't use it, or it would be much more difficult to use it. If you had a strategy to make the entire classification of drugs, if they are available, tamper resistant, then that should slow down the access of diverted OxyContin or a similar type of opioids. It doesn't make sense to me. Isn't it true that generic OxyContin is available in Canada even after 2012, and that provincial regulatory colleges started to advise of shorter prescription lengths and lower opioid dosages in 2012? For those who are suffering from addiction, don't they just chase the next drug that is around? By moving away from tamper resistance, doesn't it make sense to utilize the technologies that are out there when you're looking at an overall strategy toward opioid abuse?
On October 4th, 2016. See this statement in context.