Okay, thank you.
We've talked about Bill C-2. Ms. Geller, you've crisply described the evidence. We know that safe consumption sites save lives. We also know, from every stakeholder in the country, that Bill C-2, which was passed by the previous government, establishes 26 separate, discrete requirements that every group I've talked to in the country says establishes unnecessary barriers to establishing safe consumption sites. It takes months. It takes hundreds of hours.
I've talked to Toronto's Board of Health. I've talked to the City of Montreal. I've talked to the City of Victoria. These are not fly-by-night operators that want to open safe consumption sites. These are municipalities and boards of health in our provinces telling us that safe consumption sites save lives and that this legislation puts up unnecessary barriers.
Ms. Geller, you said that your strategy is to explain the barriers to the groups, but these groups aren't telling me that they need the barriers explained to them. They're telling me that they need the barriers removed.
My question is actually for Ms. Notarandrea. Does your group support the repeal or the streamlining of Bill C-2 so we can get more safe consumption sites up and running and save lives?