That review is ongoing, so I think it's premature to say any conclusions have been drawn yet, but we are assessing the bill, the CDSA portions that relate to the specific provisions on applying for a supervised consumption site, against the experiences we're having now.
Over a period of many months, we've had numerous discussions with potential applicants. There is actually currently only one applicant that has submitted, which is well known, and that is Montreal. Obviously, we have the most experience with Montreal, because they are furthest along. We are trying to have very detailed conversations with them to understand whether there are any specific criteria that are problematic for them. If perhaps it's just more of an issue around not really understanding what's required, as I think I mentioned earlier, they are finding it very useful, particularly when we can very accurately describe for them in the context of Insite's application precisely the type of information they need to submit.
In that context of the real lived experience we have had over the last year along with analyzing that against the legislation, we will be able to make some recommendations to the minister in due course.