No. As I said at the beginning, it would only be clause 3. First of all, having heard this testimony, I've asked them not to table that first round of amendments because I think it was really important what we heard from the authors on the intent of the bill that they had. However, I also want to respect what we heard from the witnesses in the first round.
I was not going to make or ask for any other changes in clause 3 except for this one, which deals with a national strategy for dementia, which I thought was more consistent with what we heard from our witnesses.