Thank you for the question.
One of the strengths of Medavie Blue Cross is that it is professional in the provision of health care and the administration of that. It has an expertise that the department does not have or it's very hard to maintain. Therefore, we buy it and it does the administrative part, which is not always the highest value part—the money part is always high but I mean the contribution. We brought in a pharmacist and a doctor to do the right monitoring, as identified by the OAG, but for the widget counts and getting the payments out and paying the pharmacies, it was more cost-effective to go with a company like this. It's not the only company but it is our provider, Medavie Blue Cross.
The other thing is that Medavie Blue Cross has a relationship with the pharmacies across the country, with portals where the pharmacist can bill us through not a paper process but an electronic process, and then Medavie can do the right monitoring of any duplications. These are things we could not do. I think, on the whole, it was much more beneficial to us to have it administered by a third party.