Okay.
In a previous life, I worked in a hospital that served a large population of people from the Jehovah's Witness faith group. We had a physician who was part of that faith group and worked through some quite robust strategies in ER and OR to manage the population without having to use blood transfusions. It was all done through the medical advisory committee reviews and whatnot. This was back just when the crisis hit. When we were doing all the look-backs, the patient notifications, and the work on transparency at that time, no one from the Jehovah's Witness group, that I can remember, was involved. That's going back 15 or 20 years.
Do we do enough to push for the non-use of blood products? I was looking at the research last night. There are volume replacement strategies. There are high inspired oxygen concentrators. There are patient blood management programs, both interoperative and post-operative. There are cell salvage strategies that could be employed, and autologous donations. Could we not be doing a lot more to reduce the risk of blood transfusion by doing a better job of using alternatives to blood transfusion?