I think what you've asserted is fair. I will just note, though, when you're talking about up-charge, whether it's for a lighter weight cast, or some kind of—I don't want to call them bells and whistles because there may be some therapeutic benefits—norm in that jurisdiction, the standard of care up to here is publicly insured. If somebody wants to pay for an embellishment then they're free do to that, but I think where we want to draw the line is that what would be defined as medically necessary care is covered.
The issue of private clinics is a long-standing issue, and we're very concerned about it. I'll just say, just so members of the committee are aware, that there is a charter challenge in British Columbia. An owner of one of the more lucrative private clinics is basically asserting that his charter of rights as a provider and the charter of rights of patients are being infringed by virtue of his not being able to sell care and the patients not being able to buy it. I think frankly the result of that case will have a very important impact.