Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Don was saying that he was just reordering it. I would say that there are significant changes.
For example, if you look under “Application” in proposed subsection 56.1(2), it says “shall include evidence, submitted in the form and manner determined by the Minister, of the intended public health benefits of the site and information, if any, related to”, and then it lists it down.
In Don's section of “Evidence”, it says “may take into account”. In other words, there is not really a requirement for the minister to do it. Anything that weakens the consultation process, Conservatives are not going to be in favour of.
As well, what's in place now, we hear, is onerous. However, the minister approved three new sites just this past week, and I assume they were approved under the old structure, because this is not the new law yet, so unless this is just an attempt to rubber-stamp things.... We're not going to be supporting anything that weakens the consultation phase in any way whatsoever, so we won't be supporting Mr. Davies' amendment.