That's true. I know the scope of the bill is always a very opaque and abstract determination, but clause 42 of the bill that passed says this:
For the purpose of allowing certain activities to take place at a supervised consumption site, the Minister may, on any terms and conditions that the Minister considers necessary, exempt the following from the application of all or any of the provisions of this Act
The act itself deals squarely, I think, in pith and substance, with the minister having the discretion to grant an exemption on any terms and conditions that she feels necessary.
If you look at Ms. May's amendment—