It's a great question. I'm going to speak to the policy component.
As we know, Canada has a long-standing gender-based analytic framework that has been dusted off and redeployed as the GBA+ framework. My suggestion is that if we're looking at this from a policy perspective, let's use the tools that we already have made a constitutional commitment to, including GBA, and let's look at how well GBA is being incorporated into evaluating sexual health promotion in schools, as an example.
If the point that our colleague from the States is trying to make is that all pornography is toxic to the brain, let's actually do a gender-based analytic response to that by looking at how sexual health information that is correct information deals with that issue of misogyny or with that issue of “rape is always okay”, and if you see it, you just enact it. To me, that ebb and flow of logic really does speak to the need to look at what are Status of Women tools bringing to the task of answering those questions you've alluded to. I think that the GBA+ framework is something that we should be bringing to task on this particular issue in Canada.