I would ask Mr. Oliver to clarify that. My understanding of that amendment is that the current words “may include” mean that the conference that is convened can look at these factors, but may look at things beyond what's listed. That's what “include” means. By changing it to “in relation to”, it would suggest to me that the conference would be restricted to what follows.
I'd like to know if that's the intent of his amendment. I just want to make sure that I understand its meaning. Perhaps after Mr. Oliver answers, the clerk could help us with that.