For the international treaties, I had them lumped in with other jurisdictions' experiences, but that's fine. That's international treaties, so there are those three additional topics.
Then we would try to submit our witnesses in a way that is organized around those topics and, if you have a general witness, which of those categories you think they would be best suited to so they can be slotted in, so that we give.... We're all going to be submitting massive lists and they need some structure. We can do it this way or we can reconvene the subcommittee and mandate it to set up the meetings. We would do that sometime in that first week of August, but in neither one are we going to be requiring a report back to the committee. If it's the chair and the analysts, or if it's a subcommittee, we have to mandate them today so that we can come to work that week and get working on this bill for Canadians.
I'm happy either way on this motion. Can we be a bit loose on order? Do you want to do a subcommittee or do you want to have the chair and analysts setting up the meeting?