Thank you.
In terms of age, I think Mr. Oliver also described some of the competing issues we have. I'm not suggesting this at this point but just as a concept, this government has chosen age 18 as the floor, and I'm thinking that a number of factors would at least suggest that it should be 19.
It sounds to me like the later you can delay the onset of cannabis use, it's intuitively better for brain development. Seven out of 10 provinces already set the age for drinking at 19, and it strikes me that there are fewer 19-year-olds in high school generally, so you would limit legitimate legal cannabis possession in high schools. That's competing against the reality that 15- to 18-year-olds are getting cannabis no matter what we do or say.
I'm just wondering about it. Given all of those things, would you suggest that 19—I think you've mentioned 21—would be a more reasonable floor, or are we just being arbitrary?