That's correct, because, as I said, measuring the health benefits of having the coverage versus not having the coverage is extremely difficult to estimate. It depends on the specific situation, the patients, and the kinds of problems the patients have.
Instead of getting into that area, which becomes somewhat speculative, we decided not to take that into account. Typically in all our costing that's how we do it: we do not take into account the secondary impacts and the knock-on impacts of any program.