Well, I certainly agree with Mr. Oliver in substance—we join on the issue of it—but I would point out that as the mover of it, he should move it certainly as a substantive improvement but with no honour, given what just occurred. I have to point out the disingenuousness of his last comment. He made a reference to the fact that this motion contained the words “renumbering the remaining provision and amending all references to it accordingly“, and that this is an advantage of his motion. That he just voted against adding those exact words to the NDP amendment must be recorded for posterity.
