I certainly agree with Mr. Oliver. In substance we join on the issue of it, but I would point out that as the mover of it, he should move it certainly as a subset of improvement, but with no honour. Given what just occurred, I have to point out the disingenuousness of his last comment by making a reference to the fact that this motion contained words of renumbering the remaining provisions and amending references to it accordingly as being an advantage of his motion when he just voted against adding those exact words to the NDP amendment must be recorded for posterity.
On February 28th, 2018. See this statement in context.