I think timing is of immense importance in the process going forward. I think if you would call upon all of the various stakeholders, they would probably agree that some clear national standards that we all buy into would be very helpful for those who are on the front lines.
I also believe it requires some statutory obligations, as I said in responding to one of the earlier questions. I don't think we can just have a framework; I think we need a framework that has statutory teeth, such that people are going to have to report on a regular basis in terms of what is transpiring and what is not transpiring. It's all well and good to have the framework, but someone has to exercise it to see that the stockpiles are renewed, that we don't have antiquated equipment, that people are trained, that we're looking for the best practices worldwide and that we're taking into consideration the practices of the World Health Organization in terms of all of their abilities. From that perspective, I say yes to the national framework, but it needs to have some teeth, and I think the teeth are the statutory obligations of the parties going forward.