Nakurmiik. Thank you, Niki.
I think, just from a structural standpoint, an Inuit Nunangat policy approach should be employed any time the federal government is considering specific interventions for our communities. That means not leaving behind Nunatsiavut and Nunavik in a northern policy approach because that's really the way in which a lot of these interventions are structured—north of 60, south of 60. We are a very considerable part of this country, and our policy space should be contiguous from all Inuit regions and then also the urban components as well.
Then you get into the specific considerations for our most vulnerable. We have Inuit in long-term care facilities in the south because of a lack of care facilities in Inuit Nunangat. We have a large number of urban Inuit in the south who require very specific considerations and sometimes fall through the cracks. Luckily, we have our land claim organizations that are specifically considering the needs of elders at this point in time. There have been either direct payments or vouchers that have been given to them so that they can have food, but when it comes to the functioning of the health system, the near-term care and the ability to act quickly in response is going to save lives. Even if we don't have the numbers today, that specific consideration of getting point-of-care testing to our most vulnerable and then being able to treat Inuit where they live, rather than shipping Inuit south, is also going to save lives.