I think there's research indicating patterns. Of course, there are some good for-profit homes. There are some bad municipal homes even, or not-for-profit homes, but the pattern is clear that there tends to be lower staffing in for-profit. There tends to be more reliance on part-time and casual employees in for-profit. There are patterns of more ulcers, more transfers to hospitals and more falls. There is a whole host of patterns that are much more common in for-profit homes than in non-profit homes.
I should be clear that we said “non-profit”. That isn't talking about the government taking over all the homes. I'm talking about taking the profit out of care. I don't see any reason to put the money into profit when we're not particularly getting a benefit out of it, and in fact it may be the reverse. Why isn't that money going to care? It's—