I'll argue with you, Mr. Chair. We can go back to the blues. I think you're wrong.
However, that isn't my intervention. My intervention is based on Mr. Thériault's amendment.
I'm not sure if he is simply looking for less work to do or what, but requesting the removal of “emails”.... I think it's pertinent to essentially what we're trying to get at. There is certainly a lot of back and forth over email. If you remember, this is the same member who brought up the removing of “text messages” as well—both times.
This is certainly something that I would argue is important for us at the committee level to understand. We're looking at the overall response of this thing.
If Mr. Thériault doesn't want to read a whole bunch of emails, then he simply doesn't have to read those emails. We'll do that work for him. I certainly don't support his amendment, and I will be voting against it.