Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My concern is around getting clarity in terms of the information that's being covered. If we say anything up to August 31, or August 10 for that matter, these are ongoing negotiations, so what happens if there are discussions that go on after that? Shouldn't we be spending some time defining the start date and the finish date for when these documents are covered, or do we intend for these documents to be available in the interest of full transparency? What happens if something comes forward or if there's a document that's eligible for review on August 31? Should we define August 31 as the timeline for the review of the documents that we have in place and then have a timeline for reporting?
I'm a bit confused in terms of the “up to”. If it said August 31 specifically, then we would know we're dealing with information from the time that the discussion started with COVID and for what length of time we're going to be including the information. It's not clear to me how much information we're seeking, because we don't have a start date and a finish date. I'd like some clarity on that from the person who proposed the motion.