Thank you, Chair.
I'll follow up a little bit on what Mr. Fisher was saying. This language was used in February. According to some members of the committee, documents came back excessively redacted. I'm wondering what would be different this time. Departmental officials surely have their rules within the department to apply access to information through an established process. Surely they're not going to send documents that they haven't vetted through that process to the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel. Surely they have their own rules that apply to the information in their possession.
I'm just puzzled to see how this would really result in a different outcome this time.