Thanks very much, Mr. Chair.
To wrap up my comments, I think my subamendment is one that bridges the sides. The amendment that was moved by Ms. Sidhu is much broader in its scope, which raises the concern that important information may be redacted, and then seeking these documents would become meaningless. This is a process the committee embarked on before, and the documents that came back were effectively meaningless because much of the information was redacted.
If the concern truly is to ensure that people's privacy is dealt with, then we can do that with my subamendment, to ensure that privacy issues are protected, which is to say that people's names and personal information would be redacted from the documents.
To the other point, on February 26, the health committee did pass such a motion on a different matter, requesting documents, briefing notes and so on, and the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons had undertaken the work to vet the documents for these three reasons: privacy, cabinet confidence and national security.
I'm hoping my subamendment will get support so we can move on to dealing with the many other issues that are before us today at committee.