No. Dr. Jaczek moved to change the dates in the motion for the delivery of the documents. Ms. Kwan proposed a friendly subamendment to change only the dates for the documents pertaining to the national stockpile and that they be delivered in one fell swoop at a later date. The decision to deal with Dr. Jaczek's amendment in that fashion was passed by unanimous consent, but we still have Dr. Jaczek's amendment on the floor, as we have unanimously agreed that it should be deemed to have been moved.
We're still on Dr. Jaczek's amendment. I suspect we're probably all in agreement with it, but we should, if there is no debate, take a vote on it. If there is debate, we will continue to debate that item.
The debate is on Dr. Jaczek's amendment, as subsequently modified by unanimous consent.
Is there any discussion on Dr. Jaczek's amendment? I'm seeing none, so we will call a vote.
Madam Clerk, could you please call the vote on Dr. Jaczek's amendment, as amended by unanimous consent?