Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I anticipate that we're probably going to have a discussion about emails being included. Obviously, this motion includes the emails as part of that. I certainly still believe that the emails and as much information as possible are what we intend to gather, so I would point specifically to that part of the motion.
I'm a little nervous after the last committee meeting, with the discussion about ATIP versus the parliamentary counsel being able to produce documents, and would suggest again that the committee accordingly look to the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, based on the information they provided on our previous motion. Outside of emails, that would be the other skeptical point I have.
Certainly I'm not eager to put a huge burden on the public service, but if they're doing this work already with OGGO, then it should be simple. They should be able to provide a lot of that information to us.
Again, based on those two points, I think our motion is slightly different.